Chemfab Alkalies operates in the heavy chemicals industry
and is in the business of manufacturing Chlor Alkali products.
It primarily manufactures Caustic Soda Lye, comprising about
75% of revenues, which is used in various basic industries such as paper,
aluminium, textiles, etc. It also
produces chlorine (comprising 12%-13% of revenues), hydrogen, sodium hypo
chlorate, and hydro chloric acid – also finding applications in various manufacturing
industries.
The company reported reasonably stable (albeit somewhat
declining) operating profits and revenues in the last five years – reporting about
16cr in operating profits on revenues of 77cr in the last financial year. It held cash and liquid assets of over 27cr
as at 31st March, 2012
The business is very cyclical – dependent not only on international
demand fluctuations (primarily from aluminium manufacturers) arising from global
economic cycles but also global oversupply in its own industry arising from
capacity additions by competitors. For
e.g., the company operated only at 75-80% capacity in the previous year when
excess supply was not fully absorbed by demand.
This situation results in dampening of selling prices.
The business is exposed to increases in energy as well as
raw material costs. This is usually
passed through to customers but this appears to be more a function of industry
practice than firm-specific competitive advantages.
It is also exposed to a weakening INR as it is generally a
net importer of capital equipment.
The outlook for the chlorine business doesn’t appear to be
promising and demand growth is slower than the caustic business – management
foresees low capacity utilisation in this segment for the near future.
Management have adopted a niggardly dividend policy despite
the abundance of liquid resources (see above). They have stated “lower volumes
.. lower profitability .. need to conserve liquid funds” as reasons for not
recommending ANY dividend for the year.
Any equity shareholder reading this should forcefully challenge management on
this reasoning – the extent of the policy is surely unreasonable considering
the abundance of liquid assets available with the company.
Management of several listed companies have gotten away for far too long with
such disregard for equity shareholders – it is time for equity shareholders to step up and
take action to rightfully assert a more rational dividend policy concerning
their equity shares.
Comments
Post a Comment