Skip to main content

Apar Industries


Apar Industries operates in the power sector manufacturing Transformer Oil and Conductors.

The company is one of the leading companies in both segments and revenues are split about equally among both.  Management expects to benefit from the myriad steps taken by the government to build up power infrastructure and address the persistent demand/supply gap in this sector.

The company amalgamated ‘Uniflex Cables’ into its business in the last financial year.  This was considered a sick industrial company under the BIFR.  See discussion of cable business below.

The company reported reasonably steady growth in consolidated revenues and operating profits considering the nature of the industry – reporting about 180cr in operating profits on revenues of about 3,000cr in the last financial year.  It employed minimal debt to finance its operations.

The business is generally exposed to rises in commodity prices, particularly those of non-ferrous metals and base oils, which form a large proportion of raw material costs.  It is a net importer and is exposed to a weakening INR. 

The conductor segment is particularly dependent on Power Grid tenders, which forms a disproportionately large share of the market – therefore, any slowdowns in projects adversely impacts this segment’s revenues.  

Both segments are characterised by high competition, which reduces profit margins during lean times. 

The cable business is unprofitable as a result of intense competition. 

The company attempts to mitigate metal price and foreign exchange fluctuations by employing hedging strategies.  This is somewhat questionable since management don’t have any particular hedging expertise – or it should enter the financial markets and abandon its current operations.  However, management performs hedging on a “back-to-back” basis i.e. hedging on the back of firm sales orders thereby reducing the risk of open positions.

The auditors have pointed out non-provision of mark-to-market losses on derivative contracts amounting to about 28cr in the last financial year.  Management haven’t recorded this loss saying it’s notional in nature and will even itself out over the contract.  While the contract will show a profit over the course of time (if they’ve hedged on a back-to-back basis), it does indicate the loss as a result of their hedging choice, when they could have bought the commodity at the lower market price at the balance sheet date i.e. it indicates an opportunity cost arising as a result of management choice, which is not entirely irrelevant in an investor’s consideration.

Management has issued options to employees, which is irritating to minority shareholders unless the amounts are immaterial and results in truly enhanced long-term profitability.  Employees are hired by the company to do a job and the salary should be ‘motivation’ enough.  They cannot take from the owners of the business unless they risk their own capital.  An option gives them all the upside with no downside – it’s an appropriation of future profits from existing shareholders.

Moreover, management appears to have issued shares to a mutual fund last year at a strike price of about INR 220, which is puzzling considering the adequacy of free cash flows generated by the business.  This is an unexpected instance of short-changing existing shareholders by management.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On The Radar: India's Small-Cap Equities (Concluded)

We have been running a series of articles titled ‘Under The Radar: India’s Small-Cap Equities’ beginning in December 2011 - and followed up twice - with the last article in December 2013. We would like to conclude this series after updating the small-cap index level and returns, comparing it to our expectations ex-ante, and analysing the current scenario.  Following this, we have also outlined where we may take this blog in the future. The small-cap index closed at 11,087.07 on December 31 st , 2014.  This compares to a level of 6,150.65 in our last article – resulting in an advance of over 80% to date. This is a handsome absolute return by any standard, particularly compared to Indian government bonds, which yielded around 8-9% for the period.  This justifies the conclusion at the end of our previous article that “small-caps in India offer among the most attractive bargains during any time since 2006 and certainly in the entire Indian stock market today...

IFB Agro Industries

IFB Agro Industries is in the business of producing alcohol (70% to 75% of revenues) and marine products. The company is based out of the state of West Bengal (WB), which is well known for its regressive attitudes towards businesses.  In the alcohol segment, it distributes ‘Volga’ vodka, ‘Jubilation’ rum, ‘Benjamin’ brandy (latter two launched recently).  Demand in the Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL) appears to have a promising outlook with growth estimated at about 20% per annum.  It has also installed a new plant to enhance its country liquor production capacity since demand was outstripping supply – however, licenses weren’t granted by the state as at the end of last year.  In the marine segment, it distributes frozen marine products in the major metros through retail chains under the “IFB Royal” brand.  It also has a 48% market share in the shrimp feed trading business.  It had recently enhanced capacities in the marine division includi...

Under The Radar: India’s Small-Cap Equities (Part Three)

In February of this year, we summarised the valuation parameters of the BSE Small-cap Index in India (now the S&P BSE Small Cap Index) - following on from an earlier report we wrote in December, 2011 - and drew certain conclusions. We would like to update the valuation scenario with the data today, review those conclusions, and form new ones based on the available information. The small-cap index closed today (17 th December, 2013) at 6,150.65 with an indicated price to book value of 1.04. The closing value as on February, 2013 was 7,006.73 representing a decline of over 12% as of today. The current index value masks a greater fall of over 27% to a low of 5,085.56 in August, 2013. This represents an unsatisfactory overall performance for those who invested in small caps at the beginning of the year. In our earlier report, we made two assumptions towards the end of our report to form a conclusion as to prices then:          ...